Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Lisa Anllo PhD's avatar

Jamie, I appreciate your dispassionate logical reasoning in the midst of a maelstrom of political noise surrounding the release of the Cass Review—individualized care grounded in careful research is in fact her major take home message which is fairly moderate and might not make everyone happy on either side, and I found the NPR interview to be equally moderate in seeking to find an elusive path forward that stops short of the blunt instrument of legally banning any and all medical care for youth, which remains a very challenging question that was addressed in commentary made by the 2 US psychologists who weighed in alongside Dr Cass

And your point that happily transitioned adults should not be assuming their story is applicable to all minors seeking similar care is a very important one, it’s hard to explain in any other way why careful screening based on knowledge of multiple pathways to self ID and understanding of subgroups seeking medical transition could be so controversial except for that fundamental error which seems to drive all the activism on the political left

Expand full comment
David Charles's avatar

How about just LEAVING THE KIDS ALONE? This experimental bullshit is the same damned thing the Nazi party did in the 30s and 40s. And don’t give us that crap that MILLIONS of children are affected by this “gender dysphoria” fad. Millions of kids are affected/influenced by your constant bombardment of stupidity on the internet.

When your ilk and your incredibly twisted campaigns of propaganda end up getting families tangled up with child protective agencies, you have WAY CROSSED THE LINE.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts