Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Deeply_Concerned's avatar

Here is my letter:

Dear Ms Alsalem,

Thank you for your letter to the WHO and for the concerns it raises. I am grateful for your courage!

My name is First Name LastName, I am a mother, a lifelong progressive liberal, and I support the LGB community. But I am deeply concerned about the current practice of irreversible medical and surgical interventions for gender-distressed children, teens, and late adolescents.

I am personally connected to this issue as a bisexual adult who was gender nonconforming as a child and teen. I am lucky that I grew up during a time period where I was able to retain my body integrity and was not encouraged to burden it with hormones and surgical interventions. In my life I have been able to completely express my individual gender identity, behavior, dress, and appearance without having to resort to tampering with my healthy functioning body.

Gender distress is real, and gender non-conformity can and should be supported and validated but the current practice of medicalization and surgery is deeply wrong and harmful. There are new initiatives and emerging research that indicates many paths to recovery without these harmful interventions. Genspect (genspect.org) is one excellent example.

Thank you,

First Name Last Name

Massachusetts, USA

Expand full comment
Suzanne's avatar

Thank you for calling this to our attention. Here's what I sent:

I am writing to thank you for your recent letter to Dr. Ghebreyesus regarding WHO's plans to develop guidelines on the health of trans and gender diverse people.

I am an American mother of a trans-identifying young adult and have seen up close the mental and physical health risks associated with both gender dysphoria and with medicalized "gender affirming care". My family has been deeply let down - and my child's health and well-being endangered permanently - by health professionals, therapists and by activists of the sort that WHO is intended to have on its "guideline development group". As you rightly insist, the "GDG" must include clinicians whose evidence-based research has arrived at different conclusions than those of the activist group members. Those clinicians' voices and research need to be amplified, for our children's safety.

You rightly also call out the WHO approach to self-ID and the risks WHO's approach poses to female-only spaces and women's and girls' rights and security. Thank you for restating that "a right to legal gender recognition does not imply a right to

unregulated self-identification of gender identity without appropriate safeguarding and risk assessment".

Thank you for continuing to speak out in support of women and girls and in support of children vulnerable to trans-activism, and trans-activist clinicians. I am deeply grateful for your work.

Expand full comment
14 more comments...

No posts