One Way Only

Questioning the Trans Narrative and Breaking Free from a Singular Path to Authenticity

There is a prevailing narrative in many corners of the transgender community: once a trans identity is on the table, the only valid direction is toward transition. Doubts are not opportunities for reflection, but hurdles to overcome. However, this narrative risks oversimplifying the complexities of identity, erasing the nuances of self-discovery in favor of a single-minded story of progress.

Across support groups, forums, and social media, encouragement to transition is widespread. Yet this support often comes with an unspoken rule: questioning the process is taboo. Doubts, when expressed, are rarely seen as legitimate. Instead they are framed as signs of weakness, fear, or internalized transphobia. The implicit message is clear—hesitation undermines not just personal growth but the collective understanding of what it means to be transgender. In this environment, pausing or questioning one’s path can feel synonymous with rejecting one’s identity entirely.

This cultural emphasis on unidirectional progress creates a paradox: while the trans community champions diversity of identity, it can sometimes impose rigid expectations. Transition, whether social or medical, becomes the defining measure of authenticity. For those whose journeys deviate—those who question, pause, or detransition—the narrative leaves little room for understanding or acceptance.

Silencing Doubt

Eliza Mondegreen, who has written extensively about the suppression of doubt in this context, notes how hesitation is often reframed as betrayal. In her talk on trans identity and doubt, she explores how doubt is pathologized rather than embraced as a natural part of identity exploration. Her analysis of proxies for doubt delves into the subtle ways hesitation is dismissed, creating an environment where doubt feels dangerous to express.

This dismissal is especially harmful when it comes to young people navigating their identities. Influential platforms like YouTube, as Mondegreen discusses in her piece on influencers and doubt, often present transition as the only viable solution for those questioning their gender. The result is a one-size-fits-all approach that marginalizes those who may benefit from alternative paths.

Detransitioners who express regret or criticize the system frequently face hostility. The recent backlash against detransitioner Shape Shifter, captured in a public attack by Brianna Wu, demonstrates this all too clearly. Wu’s critique accuses Shape Shifter of “externalizing blame” for his struggles and dismisses his concerns as misplaced anger at Fenway Health. The acknowledgment of regret as a universal aspect of living with gender dysphoria is present, but Wu’s tone indicates a wider reluctance to address the systemic failures highlighted by detransitioners.

This resistance to honest engagement undermines the ability to create higher standards of care—something Wu claims to support. By dismissing detransitioners’ critiques, such comments perpetuate a culture of silence around doubt and regret.

Brianna Wu from X

Questioning the Definition of “Successful Transition”

In the prevailing narrative of transgender advocacy, the term “successful transition” often carries an unexamined assumption: that aligning one’s physical appearance with one’s internal sense of self through medical or social transformation is the ultimate goal. However, this perspective can inadvertently marginalize those whose journeys do not fit this mold, such as individuals who experience regret, complications, or find that transitioning does not resolve underlying mental health challenges.

Jack Turban, a prominent advocate for “gender-affirming care,” argues in his book Free to Be: Understanding Kids & Gender Identity that “most of us are probably more nonbinary than we give ourselves credit for.” Turban encourages readers to reflect on their gender identity by exploring hypothetical scenarios, such as imagining how their identity might change with different pronouns or even different genitals. While Turban presents this as a thoughtful exercise, critics argue that such approaches could pressure individuals into unnecessary self-interrogation, particularly in a culture that already places undue emphasis on gender exploration.

Critics, including Dr. Stephen Levine, have questioned whether Turban’s advocacy compromises his research objectivity. Levine says, “He has a belief system. He is ambitious and has been successful in gaining national recognition.” From a gender-critical perspective, such advocacy risks promoting a one-size-fits-all approach that may overlook the complexities of individual experiences. Levine’s critique underscores the tension between scientific inquiry and advocacy, particularly in a political climate that discourages dissent.

Stories of Detransition

Detransitioners’ narratives are often dismissed or treated as rare exceptions, rather than valid experiences within the broader spectrum of gender exploration. Chloe Cole, who began transitioning at 12 and detransitioned at 17, has been outspoken about the harm caused by this culture of unquestioning affirmation. She says, “I was told transitioning would save me. It destroyed my life.” Detransitioners Prisha Mosley and Max Lazzara echo this sentiment.

Their stories highlight the importance of creating space for doubt and alternative paths. Detransitioners are not cautionary tales or threats to trans advocacy—they are individuals whose experiences remind us of the complexities of identity.

Breaking Free: Toward a Truly Inclusive Framework

True inclusivity demands space for doubt, hesitation, and alternative outcomes. It requires acknowledging that gender exploration is not a linear path but a deeply personal, multifaceted process. Celebrating the diversity of transgender experiences means embracing not just stories of transition but also those of questioning, pausing, and detransitioning.

By fostering an environment that honors all paths, the transgender community can strengthen its advocacy and create a culture of empathy and understanding. This approach does not undermine the fight for rights and recognition but expands its foundation, making room for honesty about the complexities of identity.

In striving to protect its members, the transgender community has enforced a restrictive narrative. Breaking free of this unidirectional framework would not weaken its advocacy but deepen it, allowing for greater honesty and freedom. A supportive space must celebrate those who transition while affirming the humanity of those who choose otherwise—those who linger in doubt, question their path, or ultimately find a different understanding of themselves.

Call to Action

Subscribe to our Substack to stay informed and help us fight for a future where doubts are respected, diverse experiences are honored, and lives are protected.