Discussion about this post

User's avatar
EyesOpen's avatar

I understand that you are recounting the recommendations of the Cass Review, but why not leave the kid's body alone so they can have a child naturally if they choose later? Any body manipulation that harms fertility should be highly suspect.

Expand full comment
Ollie Parks's avatar

"All children should be offered fertility counseling and preservation before a medical pathway."

Assuming it is appropriate to call individuals who have entered puberty children, do such children have the capacity to understand fertility counseling and make informed decisions on the basis of that counseling?

For that matter, does an adolescent have the capacity to make an informed decision to decline fertility counseling?

At the end of the day, can an adolescent give informed consent to a "medical pathway," if by that we mean commencing puberty blockers or cross-sex hormones?

I submit the answer to all these questions is a firm "no." Given the true state of so-called gender medicine today, no parent or guardian should be consenting to a medical pathway on behalf of an adolescent either.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts